"It is not so much extremism as normalisation that we have to fear": Jonathan Hall KC on anti-semitic hate speech ...

The following piece was also published here on 1 Crown Office Row’s Quarterly Medical Law Review. AI is set to transform and ...

The following piece was also published here on 1 Crown Office Row’s Quarterly Medical Law Review. AI is set to transform and disrupt the way in which healthcare is delivered. The Government’s 10-year ...

The following piece was also published here on 1 Crown Office Row’s Quarterly Medical Law Review. AI is set to transform and disrupt the way in which healthcare is delivered. The Government’s 10-year ...

This post analyses the legal provisions that accompany some of the restrictions on movement of individuals announced by the Government. The movement restrictions themselves are vital to the protection ...

Article 2 of the ECHR protects the right to life. That article contains two distinct substantive obligations: “the general obligation to protect by law the right to life, and the prohibition of ...

R (on the application of) Gudanaviciene and others v The Director of Legal Aid Casework and others [2014] EWCA Civ 1622 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that the Lord Chancellor’s ...

Football fans everywhere will be familiar with reckless tackles, whether from their own Sunday league experience or as followers of the professional game. But when will a tackle amount to negligence ...

In this two-part article, Ruby Peacock, an aspiring barrister and currently a legal and policy intern at the Legal Resources Centre in Cape Town, examines the history of medical claims brought under ...

In Khan v. Meadows [2021] UKSC 21 the Supreme Court has revisited the principles to be applied in “wrongful birth” claims: claims for the cost of bringing up a disabled child who would not have been ...

This article was first published on the UK Labour Law Blog ( @labour_blog). We repost it with the kind permission of Dr Philippa Collins (@DrPMCollins at Exeter University) and the editors of the ...

In Sutherland v Her Majesty’s Advocate, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that it was compatible with the accused person’s rights under ECHR article 8 to use evidence obtained by “paedophile hunter” ...