In August, a Texas man died after he couldn't escape a Cybertruck that caught fire after a crash. His family is now suing ...

This is a developing story. ABC4 will update this post with more information as it becomes available. PINE VALLEY, Utah (ABC4) — The Forsyth Fire that forced mandatory evacuations for the ...

This isn’t an EV problem—other electric trucks, like the Rivian R1T, haven’t been catching fire at anywhere near this rate. The same goes for the Ford F-150 Lightning.

An analysis claims the Cybertruck might be more dangerous than Ford’s 1970s bean car. That's due to its penchant for catching fire.

It compares this to the Ford Pinto, with 3.173 million sales from 1971 to 1980, and 27 fire fatalities, equating to a rate of 0.85 deaths per 100,000 vehicles. The Pinto was designed with the fuel ...

Conversely, we know of only 27 fire fatalities in the Ford Pinto despite some 3,173,491 sales during its ten-year production run from 1970 to 1980. That means that only 0.85 people died in the ...

FuelArc found that the fatality rate per 100,000 units was 14.52 for the Cybertruck and 0.85 for the Pinto, concluding that the Tesla model was "17 times more likely to have a fire fatality than a ...

Fuel Arc carried out its analysis by calculating the fire fatalities per 100,000 units, which was 14.5 for the Cybertruck compared to 0.85 for the Ford Pinto.

That’s 17 times the fatality rate of the Ford Pintos, whose famously flawed gas tank design on the car’s rear end led to 27 reported fire fatalities in its nine years on the road, resulting in ...

One Ford that people seem to love to hate is the Ford Pinto. When Ford introduced its first subcompact car in 1971, just one day after Chevrolet introduced the Vega, it reflected the times.

A new analysis by independent automotive blog FuelArc suggests that fire fatalities are 17 times more likely in a Cybertruck than in the infamous Ford Pinto — the posterchild of deadly cars if ...