Congress enacted the “free-choice-of-provider” provision to counteract limits on Medicaid benefits, but the Supreme Court could find there’s no right to that coverage.
In Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, the court is considering whether Medicaid recipients in South Carolina have a legal right to challenge a state order prohibiting Medicaid funds from ...
The Supreme Court sounded like it might actually rule in favor of a South Carolina Planned Parenthood affiliate in a fairly ...
The U S Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday on whether South Carolina residents have a right to choose Planned ...
Supporters of Planned Parenthood argue the state violated the Medicare and Medicaid Act of 1965, which states beneficiaries ...
The Supreme Court on Wednesday grappled with a case testing whether South Carolina was legally allowed to cut off Medicaid ...
Explore more
The court seemed closely divided over whether a Planned Parenthood patient can use a civil rights law to challenge South ...
Conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared sympathetic on Wednesday to South Carolina's bid to strip Planned ...
The court will decide whether Medicaid beneficiaries may sue to receive services under a law that lets them choose any ...
Justices heard arguments in a closely watched case that could determine whether Medicaid patients have the right to sue if a state disqualifies a provider.
The future of Planned Parenthood in South Carolina may hang in the balance of this case, brought after SC Governor Henry ...
South Carolina was sued after it disqualified Planned Parenthood South Atlantic from getting Medicaid funding even for health ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results